Practice Owner – enabler or bottlneck?
The practice owner is a key role in a KM framework, but are they a bottleneck on progress?
|Image from wikimedia commons|
I was presenting at a client internal conference recently, talking aboutKnowledge Management Frameworks. In one section of my talk, I introduced the concept of the Practice Owner, which I described on the accompanying slide as follows;
- Accountable for “Owning and managing,” or “Acting as Steward” for, defined areas of critical knowledge for the organisation
- Validates (or rejects) new knowledge
- Writes or updates practices, or delegates this within the CoP
- Broadcasts new knowledge, or delegates this within the CoP
- Often the same person as the CoP Leader
- “Will this role not be a bottleneck for learning” people asked.
- “If you put one person as arbiter for knowledge, will they not just decide what they want, and stifle discussion?”
“The important thing about this role” he said “is its connection with the Community of Practice”.
He saw this role as a Stewardship role (and he liked the term Steward) as being answerable not only to the organisation, but also to the Community of Practice. By linking Practice Owner and Community Leader, the Practice Owner then speaks on behalf of the CoP, and co-ordinates CoP knowledge into a single place. The practice Owner mediates and facilitates the process of drawing together Community Knowledge into a Community Resource which the CoP can trust and rely upon.